Precision Loss in SQLite R-Tree Coordinates: Causes and Solutions
Understanding R-Tree Coordinate Storage Limitations in SQLite
Issue Overview
The core issue revolves around precision loss when storing high-precision numerical values (e.g., GPS coordinates) in SQLite’s R-Tree virtual tables. Users report that values with 7 decimal places are truncated or rounded starting at the 6th decimal. This occurs because R-Tree modules (rtree
and rtree_i32
) use 32-bit storage formats (floats or integers) for coordinates, which inherently limit precision.
For example, a latitude value like -33.1234567
stored in an rtree
table might be persisted as -33.123456
(loss at the 7th decimal). This truncation affects applications requiring sub-meter accuracy, such as geospatial tracking, CAD systems, or scientific simulations. The problem is exacerbated when users misinterpret R-Tree as a primary data store rather than an indexing tool. SQLite’s documentation clarifies that R-Tree is designed to filter search results approximately, with final precision checks delegated to auxiliary data sources.
Underlying Causes of Precision Loss
32-Bit Float Storage in
rtree
:
The defaultrtree
module stores coordinates as 32-bit IEEE 754 floating-point numbers. These have a 23-bit mantissa, providing ~7 significant decimal digits. However, decimal precision depends on the magnitude of the value. For example:- Values < 10: 7 decimals preserved.
- Values ≥ 100: Only 5 decimals preserved.
Latitude (-90 to 90) and longitude (-180 to 180) coordinates often exceed 100 in magnitude (e.g.,
179.1234567
), causing precision loss at the 5th decimal.Integer Scaling in
rtree_i32
:
Thertree_i32
variant stores coordinates as 32-bit signed integers. While integers avoid floating-point rounding errors, they require scaling to preserve decimal precision. For instance, multiplying179.1234567
by10^7
converts it to1791234567
, which exceeds the 32-bit integer limit (2,147,483,647
), leading to overflow and incorrect storage.Misuse of R-Tree as Primary Storage:
Users often attempt to retrieve exact coordinates directly from R-Tree columns, unaware that its primary purpose is spatial indexing. Auxiliary columns or external tables are necessary for full precision.Internal Computation Precision:
Even withrtree_i32
, SQLite performs internal calculations (e.g., bounding box comparisons) using 64-bit floats. While 64-bit floats preserve 32-bit integer precision, improper scaling during input/output can reintroduce errors.
Resolving Precision Loss: Strategies and Implementation
1. Use Auxiliary Columns for Exact Values
- Step 1: Create an R-Tree table alongside a regular table storing exact coordinates:
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE geospatial_index USING rtree( id, minx, maxx, -- 32-bit floats miny, maxy ); CREATE TABLE geospatial_data( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, exact_minx REAL, -- 64-bit double exact_maxx REAL, exact_miny REAL, exact_maxy REAL );
- Step 2: Insert data into both tables:
INSERT INTO geospatial_index VALUES (1, -33.123456, -33.123450, 150.123456, 150.123460); INSERT INTO geospatial_data VALUES (1, -33.1234567, -33.1234501, 150.1234567, 150.1234603);
- Step 3: Query using R-Tree for approximate matches, then filter with exact values:
SELECT data.* FROM geospatial_index idx JOIN geospatial_data data ON idx.id = data.id WHERE idx.minx <= -33.1234567 AND idx.maxx >= -33.1234567 AND idx.miny <= 150.1234567 AND idx.maxy >= 150.1234567 AND data.exact_minx = -33.1234567;
2. Scale Coordinates for rtree_i32
- Step 1: Choose a scaling factor that avoids overflow. For GPS coordinates (max ±180°), scaling by
10^7
works:CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE geospatial_scaled USING rtree_i32( id, minx, maxx, -- 32-bit integers miny, maxy );
- Step 2: Convert coordinates to integers during insertion:
# Python example lat = -33.1234567 scaled_lat = int(lat * 10**7) # -331234567
INSERT INTO geospatial_scaled VALUES (1, -331234567, -331234501, 1501234567, 1501234603);
- Step 3: Reconvert during queries:
SELECT id, minx * 1e-7 AS exact_minx, maxx * 1e-7 AS exact_maxx FROM geospatial_scaled;
- Critical Consideration: Ensure scaled values fit within
[-2,147,483,648, 2,147,483,647]
. For example,180 * 10^7 = 1,800,000,000
, which is within the 32-bit limit.
3. Hybrid Approach: Indexing with R-Tree and Storing Exact Values in Auxiliary Columns
SQLite allows attaching auxiliary columns to R-Tree tables for storing exact values:
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE geospatial_hybrid USING rtree(
id,
minx, maxx,
miny, maxy,
exact_minx REAL, -- Auxiliary columns
exact_maxx REAL,
exact_miny REAL,
exact_maxy REAL
);
During queries, use the auxiliary columns for exact comparisons:
SELECT * FROM geospatial_hybrid
WHERE minx <= -33.1234567 AND maxx >= -33.1234567
AND exact_minx = -33.1234567;
4. Understanding Internal Computations
- Myth:
rtree_i32
uses 32-bit floats for computations. - Reality: SQLite uses 64-bit floats internally, preserving the precision of 32-bit integers. For example, a scaled integer
1791234567
(1,791,234,567) is converted to a 64-bit float during computation. Since 64-bit floats have a 52-bit mantissa, they can exactly represent all integers up to2^53
(9,007,199,254,740,992), far exceeding 32-bit limits.
5. Precision Thresholds and Error Margins
- GPS at Equator:
- 1° ≈ 111 km.
- 1e-7° ≈ 1.11 cm.
- 32-bit Float Precision:
- At 180°, the smallest representable difference is
~0.0000305°
(3.4 meters).
- At 180°, the smallest representable difference is
- 32-bit Integer with Scaling (1e7):
- Smallest difference:
1e-7°
(1.11 cm).
- Smallest difference:
6. Debugging Overflow in rtree_i32
If INSERT INTO rtree_i32
fails silently:
- Step 1: Check scaled values:
SELECT minx, maxx FROM geospatial_scaled WHERE id = 1;
- Step 2: Verify integer limits:
scaled = int(180.1234567 * 10**7) # 1,801,234,567 (overflows) scaled = int(179.9999999 * 10**7) # 1,799,999,999 (safe)
7. Best Practices
- Always store exact coordinates externally or in auxiliary columns.
- Use R-Tree for fast approximate searches, not direct value retrieval.
- Prefer
rtree_i32
with scaling for applications requiring <1 cm precision. - Validate coordinate ranges before insertion to prevent overflow.
By combining these strategies, developers can mitigate precision loss while leveraging R-Tree’s performance benefits for spatial indexing.